Interstellar

While it seems like just another “adventure in space” film on the surface, it really is much more subtle and impressive. It definitely has disasters, threats from alien worlds, lots of loud noises, fancy machines, brave guys to look up to and cowardly guys to look down on, and pretty girls aplenty, if that’s your genre, but it has a far greater depth than that too. Think of that as a bonus. In fact, think of the whole thing as a thinking person’s movie, from beginning to end. You’ll definitely get more out of it that way. I agree with the reviewer who said if you like being spoon-fed a plot, you’ll hate this movie. Well maybe not hate it exactly. If you’re 12 and your notion of “plot” is video games, you’re good to go. If you’re an adult who likes video games, you’ll just wonder why you wasted your time on the movie when you could have been playing video games instead. Everyone has their own way of participating; you get marks for being there. I wasn’t certain I’d like the movie—though I like disaster movies, and I had a cold. I wanted to watch others “suffer” as I was. And I’ve liked Mathew McConaughey’s movies in the past, so I gave this one a try. From the first, I realized this was a subtle work, much like legitimate theater and requiring active cooperation from the viewer. Surprise, surprise! Somebody gave me credit for thinking actual thoughts. Opening scenes seemed like it was “today,” especially those scenes of very much senior members of society reminiscing on TV about what it was like during the Dust Bowl days. Okay. But then the hero of the film says he always came back from flying at the speed of light and close to black holes, and bingo, I realized this was not “today” as in 2023, but not so very far in the future that everything looks like something from a 1920s movie about the “Future”—think “Metropolis” (1927). The whole movie is like that, giving the viewer little strange details about what’s going on without actually telling you. You start thinking, “It could be this…,” “Maybe it’s that….” “Well, this is kind of fun.” Like a “who-dun-it” movie. As things progress, you start to realize that this film incorporates an awful lot of what’s theorized in modern physics, so someone onboard is obviously steeped if not totally stewed in Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. (After reading a synopsis on Wikipedia, I realized that the famous physicist Kip Thorne was involved. We’re not talking kindergarten physics here—though I’ve no doubt today’s kindergarteners know way more about physics than I do). I was interested to see where they went with it. About ¾ of the way through it, though, I was a little disappointed. I felt like I was being led down a rabbit hole. Then I realized it was intentional. As usual with something that intrigues me, and this movie certainly did, I started thinking about the characters. What motivated them. And not just the characters as people, but the actors who were chosen to portray them. What was the meaning there? What was I supposed to have learned that I might have missed? In thinking about it a whole lot I realized, who but Michael Caine could produce such a convincing and compassionate character like “the mad scientist” Brand. The man’s a genius. I mean, who but Michael Caine could star with an entire cast of Muppet puppets and not come out second best? And Ann Hathaway? Really? Seems like everyone hates her for being so versatile and successful as an actress, as a woman. And her character goes on to be the stepmother of humankind. And what about McConaughey, he’s always a mister ordinary nice-guy, brave soul, laid back fellow, your next-door neighbor who always lets you borrow his snow-blower every winter, even though you never even replace the gas. And Matt Damon, he’s a born “hero” if ever there was one, or at least he plays the role well. And that’s when I got it. They’re all intentional typecasts. They’re all paradigms and foils for one another. Ultimately for all of us. They’re “Us” put in positions that try them/us, sometimes to the limits of endurance. I mean, poor Mann—what a name for a character who fails to be what everyone including himself expects him to be. The whole thing is about what strengths we bring with us to a tense situation that others can’t or don’t. About them/us facing the actual facts about who or what we are and especially are not. About facing unpleasant facts and dealing with them—or not. About sacrificing self or resisting it, about making excuses for ignoble behavior because we know we haven’t lived up to the image we had of ourselves but pretend "it’s all for a good cause,” “I really hate myself, but I have to do this,” and “I’m “really sorry, but….” Would you have been entirely sane if you endured what Mann had? And the robots. What about the robots? They were programed to be human but acknowledged that they were machines. That’s pretty self-aware, actually far more self-aware than the people. And it took a movie miracle plot twist, a deus ex machina intervention, to pull us out of the spot we got ourselves into. Is that a suggestion that the authors feel we are in for it, sort of “hang on, we’re in for a bumpy ride?” I think so. Someone once asked me if I thought humans could pull the earth away from a major climate catastrophe. I’m a skeptic, but not a denier. I said, “You can hardly get two people to cooperate on something. How are you going to get 8 billion of them on the same page? It’s just that the price of not trying at all is unthinkable.”

Probably one of the best movies out there... really hoping for a second movie!!!!

I have seen numerous reviews for this movie. Some are blind praise as if anything Nolan does is from the hand of God, and others are mindless negative criticism from people who didn’t, or more likely couldn’t be bothered to try to, understand the concepts presented. On that basis, and as I have already responded to multiple reviews for this movie, I am writing a review for a movie that already has over one thousand reviews. IF YOU DO NOT LIKE FILMS WHICH LEAVE OPEN ITEMS FOR THE VIEWER TO DEDUCE THEN YOU WILL NOT LIKE THIS FILM. This does not mean the film is bad, it means it is not your type of film and giving a one star review with the only explanation being “This movie sucked” only exhibits ignorance. Giving it a low rating because you dislike films in this style and say so is entirely justified and a worthwhile observation for others who may also dislike such types of movies and not want to see them. First everyone needs to understand that this is a movie that is built around a framework and rule set grounded in astrophysics and relativity. Some of the latest theories present in that field are used as the ground work for this movie. Within that framework a story is built. Enough details as to the working of those rules are given to work out what is happening and additional research can only improve that but this is a film that does not lay out full explanations for everything happening as they happen. Some contributing factors are alluded to earlier or later in the film than the event being depicted. Some factors are left to the viewer to hypothesize themselves based on what is said. Just because you do not have a basic understanding of relativity and do not accept the entirely valid scientific explanations given in the film does not make this movie “stupid”. Worm holes and travel through them is an accepted theoretical possibility. The stretching and compression of time under the effects of speed relative to the speed of light and gravity fields is not only accepted but proven. One key item is nobody ever physically goes back in time. Time travel is a physical impossibility. Non-Story Items: Special Effects were excellent. The depictions of the worm hole and black hole were the most accurate ever shown in film to date and based directly on the models created by the physicist attached to the movie. Could they be wrong? Certainly they could but they are at least grounded in the currently widely accepted scientific theories related to such phenomena. The space craft and other hardware related to space exploration all had believable designs and concepts. I am not entirely on board with the design of the robots as the design to me looks fairly inefficient and impractical but not so much so that they detracted from the film. Visual/Cinematography were wonderfully handled. The film is a pleasure to watch with focus regularly where it needs to be and clear. Sound was less than optimal. Between hammering special effects, and a wonderful yet occasionally overpowering score there are incidents of quieter dialog being lost or noticeably hard to hear. Turn it way up to hear the dialog and you better be ready for the walls to rumble when the effects kick in. This is the one real issue I have with the film. It does not keep me from recommending this film to others but it is a valid criticism where post production really missed the mark. Casting and acting were both superb. I accepted every actor in their role and all did a great job. SPOILERS!!! From here on there are SPOILERS!!! Story: Earth is changing. Contrary to the mindless rants of many saying dust storms are destroying the planet that is not the case. Crops being eliminated by blights and the dust storms which ensue are symptoms of the rising nitrogen content in the atmosphere, this is explained and not conjecture. We do know that the human population is a small fraction of what it once was. Armies are gone and it sounds like most nations outside the USA are as well. What population is left that we see is heavily focused on growing as much food as possible. I hypothesize that with the collapse of food crops most of the planet’s human population has died off from starvation after fighting while they could and what remains is incapable of fighting. It is not unreasonable to see the United States, with its enormous farming capacity, the most advanced techniques and equipment to utilize that land, and a geographic location which protects it from direct invasion for that farmland, would fare well (better than others at least) in such a scenario. The government now decides what people will do for them. If the government wants you to be a farmer you become a farmer. “Luxuries” like smart phones, MRI machines, large scale professional sports, meat, and anything not tied to growing food are gone or shunned. As a part of keeping people focused on the “now” and not looking for “new and better” the history of the 20th century has been officially “rewritten” to demonize technological luxuries we can no longer afford. The rationale is obviously that people will not resent being denied something if they are taught that thing is intrinsically evil. A perfect example of this is the government revision of the Apollo program where now even the young teacher believes it was all a government propaganda piece to fool the Russians and make them waste money on the impossible. Another example is Cooper’s truck which is obviously kept running for decades rather than being replaced. People who disagree with this new groupthink are “unpopular” as exemplified by Cooper and his daughter Murph. His son, who wants nothing more than to farm, is a considered a model student. Do to localized fluctuations in gravity noted by Murph and later decoded as binary and Morse code messages Cooper eventually finds the remnants of NASA and learns of the mankind’s impending extinction on Earth. Many reviewers who hate this film take this point to state how much nonsense it was that Cooper was selected for the upcoming mission after surprisingly walking in there. While this is convenient, there is more at work. The upcoming mission involves going through a worm hole leading to promising systems which HAD to have been artificially created. Large, stable worm holes do not just appear naturally. This had to have been created and NASA learned of it through gravitational field manipulations which began appearing right when they really needed to start looking for an escape from Earth. Since NASA knows some entity created this worm hole and guided them to it through gravitational field manipulations when one of the only pilots with experience shows up on their doorstep after having been guided there by the same type of phenomena you are going to assume he was sent there for a reason. NASA is headed by a group of scientists including Professor Brand played by Michael Caine. Professor Brand knows Cooper and explains that there are two plans. Plan A involves solving the physics equations allowing for theoretical manipulation of gravity. This would allow the construction of large space going habitats on Earth’s surface into which the remaining population of Humans could be transported on to another habitable world. Plan B involves transporting an enormous amount of embryos in suspended state to a habitable world. After a couple generations of “hatching” and raising them, as well as those already raised raising more, a colony of viable genetic diversity would exist and humanity could begin anew on its new planet. All of humanity on Earth though would die. Missions, most likely one way missions, were sent through the worm hole years before to the worlds spotted. Those who went were to collect data, if it was promising set off their beacon and go into induced hibernation to wait for pick up. Any scientists sent to planets which were uninhabitable were most likely going to die there… Only three worlds in a single system out of the 10+ explored sent back promising signals. The mission Cooper, Brand (Ann Hathaway playing Brand’s daughter) two other scientists and two AI robots go on the mission on the Endurance to visit the three worlds, asses the conditions present, recover the scientists and return to Earth. By then it is hoped that Professor Brand on Earth will have solved the gravitational calculations and mankind will be preparing to leave for its new home. After making the two year hibernated journey to Saturn, around which the worm hole is orbiting, the crew heads through the worm hole. On the other side they will need to visit three planets, then return home. At this point it is revealed that messages sent from Earth are powerful enough to make it through the worm hole and be received but aside from the signal beacons themselves from the three planets no transmitters on this side of the worm hole have the power to send complete messages back. The crew of Endurance will be spectators to the events on Earth but cannot interact. This is the point where the first story item occurs with which I take minor umbrage with. There are three planets, the closest of which is Miller’s planet. Unfortunately that planet is far enough inside the gravity field of the black hole that one hour of time spent there equals seven years of time passage back on earth and on the Endurance. This was not clear until they came through the worm hole. The crew goes to Miller’s planet first because it is closest and has promising data. This makes no sense. Time is the enemy, not distance. They can hit the further worlds first then catch Miller’s on the way back if it looks promising. That would take 1 – 3 years. Instead they will waste a minimum of 7 years just checking Miller’s world where the astronaut who went there has only been for at most an hour relative time. The purpose of Miller’s planet though is to demonstrate relativity. Due to a mishap it is discovered the planet in uninhabitable and Miller has been dead for years Earth time, perhaps an hour Miller’s planet time. Cooper and Brand survive with the robot they took though the third astronaut dies. They make it back to Endurance, resting outside the gravity field to find twenty three years have passed. The astronaut left on Endurance did some long sleeps in hibernation but is now noticeably older. Keeping position for so many years also burned through too much fuel and resources so they can only reach one planet now and return, not two. Why go to Miller’s planet at this point when it made no sense? They went because it helped the story. Murph on earth aged twenty three more years. She is a grown woman and a gifted physicist working under a much older Professor Brand who took her under his win when Cooper left. She now plays a much bigger part in the story. We get to see the emotion of missing twenty three years of your kids’ lives in a couple of hours. We get to see what another couple of decades on Earth has revealed as conditions grow steadily worse. Choosing Miller’s planet to be first is a plot hole present only to assist the story. It is contradictory to what anyone in this situation would have done. This was a story telling decision to bring home emotional loss, the situation at earth, allow a character to mature, and lastly demonstrate the impact of relativity. I give the filmmakers a pass on this choice although I wish they had found a better way to make these points. There are now two planets left, Mann’s and Edmond’s. Edmond’s data is better although it has stopped transmitting. Mann is still transmitting. They only have fuel for one. Mann’s is chosen as he is still transmitting. For Brand this is heartbreaking as she is in love with Edmond and this is essentially a death sentence for him if he is still alive. Mann’s world is cold and bleak with an inhospitable atmosphere but after awakening Mann (Matt Damon) they learn that the planet is habitable at the lower atmospheres. His robot is in a disassembled pile. He explains it had deteriorated and he had to disassemble it for parts to keep the mission going. While on Mann’s world Professor Brand back on Earth dies of old age. On his death bed he confesses to Murph that there is no solution to the gravity equations. The information needed to resolve the equation is not known and the only place where such information exists is outside normal space time, within a black hole. He kept the fraud going for decades knowing the aforementioned Plan B was the only hope for mankind’s survival. Earth and all on it are doomed. Without the hope of salvation he knew there was no way he would have support for the mission of saving man as a species (Plan B). Murph is crushed and in only her second message to Endurance relays Professor Brand’s passing and then breaks down with the belief that her father went off into space knowingly leaving her there to die. Needless to say Cooper on Endurance is crushed by this news on several fronts. Brand (Hathaway) is shocked as the equation was her father’s life’s work. Mann confirms the truth, saving all of humanity was never considered an option by the inner circle. Cooper prepares to head back to Earth while Brand and the remaining Endurance astronaut remain to set up the “shake and bake” embryo colony with Mann. Cooper and Mann go out to scout on foot. While separated Cooper’s long range transmitter is sabotaged by Mann. Mann explains that this is a dead world. He knew that if he didn’t misrepresent it as hospitable he would die here and he was not ready for that. Obviously he disassembled the robot to keep his secret. He is going to need Endurance to survive and that means Cooper cannot take it back to Earth. In the struggle Cooper is left to die from the atmosphere with a damaged helmet while Mann heads back to base. During Mann’s trek back Cooper regains contact with Brand who takes the lander out to rescue him with one of the robots. They save him but at the same time, while trying to recover the data from Mann’s deactivated robot it explodes killing the astronaut. Mann takes the remaining craft back to Endurance while Brand and Cooper retrieve the remaining robot and race after him. Some people thought the idea of this betrayal and fight was stupid. I think it served a purpose and made sense. Mann was agreed by all to be the best of them. He lead the missions into the wormhole as man’s salvation despite the odds against his personal salvation. What we learned though was that facing the stark reality of death, alone on that dead world when all he had to do was hit that transmitter to tell Earth this planet was habitable for a chance at rescue was too terrifying a prospect. Mann, noblest of all the astronauts, betrayed his principals and that of the entire mission to save himself. He then went on to try to kill another to further his survival when confronted with losing Endurance. Man(n)’s survival instinct is paramount. Mann makes it to orbit but is unable to properly dock with Endurance. He ignores all instructions to the contrary and tries anyway resulting in his death and significant damage to Endurance. Cooper, Brand and the robots manage to dock then plan their next move. Cooper agrees to travel to Edmond’s planet as a last hope for humanity. He realizes Earth and everyone there is doomed. To get there after the additional damage they must slingshot around the black hole using it gravitational pull to accelerate them. They plan to use two of the landing craft as boosters to do so. The first will have the robot TARS in it controlling the burn. It will be dropped away to fall into the black hole once its fuel is exhausted to lighten the load and allow the Endurance to escape. Cooper is in the second craft as the burns must be controlled directly in the craft due to damage throughout Endurance. Cooper then reveals his plans to detach his craft in order for Brand to continue around the black hole and to Edmond’s planet. While in close proximity to the black hole’s gravitational pull 50+ Earth years race in minutes to Brand and Cooper. Right when this scene begins Murph is back on Earth looking around her old room and trying to get her brother’s family to leave. Cooper follows TARS into the black hole. Here is where some speculative science / science fiction happens that some take issue with. We understand now that the tidal forces of the black hole would stretch out and destroy anything dropped into it and surviving such an experience is impossible. Cooper survives entry into the black hole as does the robot TARS where they find themselves in a three dimensional structure apparently created for their benefit. This is called the Tesseract. Certainly this is a stretch but given the rules established in this movie I see it as believable. We already know some entity has significant enough control over the universe to create and maintain a worm hole. It is not a large leap to believe a species which has mastery over gravity would be able to isolate a survivable field of gravity for Cooper within the black hole. The Tesseract is a three dimensional representation of all the time in Murph’s bedroom back on Earth. Every point in time exists there simultaneously. The problem for these extra or fifth dimensional beings is identifying key points in time and conveying information. The Tesseract allows Cooper to “interact” with the past by manipulating gravity in that localized setting. Cooper manages to send Murph Morse code messages through books knocked out of her book case telling him to “Stay” when she was young and he was preparing to leave on the mission. He sends the coordinates that allowed him to find NASA in the dust falling in her room. Earlier in the movie when Cooper flips quarter into the area of the falling dust it does not obey a normal travel path dictated by Earth normal gravity, a clue something was amiss earlier in the film. Eventually he transmits via Morse code the solutions to the missing gravitational equation which could only be deduced by observing the phenomena inside a black hole. Those observations were made by TARS and relayed to Cooper who transmitted them to Murphy via manipulations in the gravitational pull on the automatic watch he Cooper had left for her. At this point many people mistakenly believe Cooper was in the past. Cooper was no more “in” the past than someone is “in” a house while standing outside and looking through the window. Just like standing outside the house Cooper is outside the three dimensional space in which Murph and everyone but TARS resides in. He is a spectator that can only interact using the one media which transcends space and time, GRAVITY. It is similar to being outside the house, trying to communicate through a closed one way window which cannot be opened. The occupant cannot see or touch you but they hear the banging. Cooper was “banging on the window” with gravity. Cooper is needed for this because he is the one who has a connection with Murph. He can find her and the moment in space time where, from the fifth dimension he is currently in, he can send her the information needed. It is during this scene that Cooper theorizes this whole event and place was crafted not by aliens but by humans, far advanced and evolved, who have mastered space, time and gravity to occupy dimensions outside those currently occupied by man. People also cry PARADOX at this point. Cooper should be able to send himself a message in the past to find NASA which is true for beings occupying three dimensional physical space and experiencing time linearly(fourth dimension). Beyond those four dimensions though time is not linear. It has all happened, past future and present. That doesn’t mean you can jump in and out of physical space at different times, it just means you can observe it all happening and something like a paradox doesn’t exist when there is no beginning or end. It sounds like fantasy but it is a viable theory in advanced physics. His work done the Tesseract collapses upon itself and Cooper is flung back into three dimensional space, through the worm hole, and out of it near Saturn. It is now 80 – 90 years after he left Earth. He awakens to find himself in a space station near the worm hole. Humanity has left Earth and is, thanks the mastery of gravity brought about by the now nearly worshipped Murphy Cooper, throughout the solar system. Cooper has a chance to meet his daughter, now an old woman who made the trip out to see him, on her death bed. She has a large family there as well, children and grandchildren. It is a touching scene. Murphy always knew it was her father who sent her the information even if nobody ever believed her. She tells him no parent should see their child die. It is her time to go and her children are there. He should go find Brand on Edmond’s world. Both Cooper and Brand are still in close sync for relative time passage. To Brand she is just getting started on her new world. Cooper takes the robot TARS, “borrows” one of the station’s craft and goes off to find Brand. The movie closes showing Brand burying Edmonds at her newly established base on the world bearing his name. She is breathing the atmosphere so it is obviously habitable. Brand’s experience at Edmond’s world is the other notable plot hole. Murph had the gravity equations 50+ years Earth time BEFORE Brand came out of the effects of the black hole’s gravity well. We know that at the end the station has many craft capable of such a trip. There is absolutely NO WAY that Brand would have arrived at Edmond’s world to not already find people from 20, 30, 40 or 50 years after she entered the time compression effect of the black hole’s gravity well. Humanity has had DECADES to catch up to Brand and her trip to Edmond’s world. It makes no sense that she is there alone. It does though provide a nice touching ending as Cooper races off to find her. This is not as forgivable a sin as the Miller’s world decision since it really wasn’t needed. They could just as easily told Cooper that Brand has arrived and been met at Edmond’s world by the settlers there. So I give this movie one minor mark against it for a corny ending that wasn’t needed, make it an overall score of 98/100 which is nothing to sneeze at. I think this is a fantastic movie. It has been compared to 2001 A Space Odyssey but I think it far surpasses that movie. People who hold up 2001 with its far more confusing an unscientifically supported ending while complaining about Interstellar’s ending do not make much sense in my opinion. Watch this movie and then watch it again. It is absolutely in my list of top ten films.

Incredible movie. I thought about it for a solid 24 hours.

I found the movie Interstellar extremely fascinating. The the story and the emotional aspect of the film was quite moving but the science and imagination shines in this one!

TODOS ABSOLUTAMENTE TODOS LOS LARGOMETRAJES DE CHRISTOPHER NOLAN CUENTAN CON ARMAS DE FUEGO. Salvo éste. Arruina-tramas más adelante. No seguir leyendo si no se ha visto la película. A pesar de ser aficionado el cine de Christopher Nolan, sus películas siempre pecan de utilizar armas de fuego para cooptar a los personajes a realizar lo que hacen. Por eso interestelar es tan buena, la motivación de los personajes no tiene que ver por medio de una amenaza individual, cada personaje tiene su motivación y su forma de ver, con el fin último de poder salvar a la humanidad. Interestelar más que hacer un guiño a grandes clásicos de la ciencia ficción, tener efectos especiales espectaculares y físicamente realistas, música inolvidable y ejecutada a la perfección como ya es costumbre de la dupla Zimmer-Nolan, es primeramente la obra maestra de un cineasta que ha alcanzado su madurez. La película toca temas fundamentales sobre la existencia humana, las motivaciones del día a día, la paternidad, el amor, el heroísmo y el sacrificio. Inicia en un futuro no especificado pero situado aproximadamente entre el 2050 y el 2100 en el cual la humanidad ha entrado en una crisis alimentaria global y no es por sobrepoblación. Lentamente construye el ambiente para que el espectador empáticamente se relacione con alguno de los personajes que presenta. Llena de giros e imprevistos la película no para de sorprender. Justo en cuanto se ha comenzado a volver tediosa, algo inesperado y perfectamente justificado sucede que dota de profundidad adicional al filme, en vez de cambiar de sentido, enriquece la narrativa. A todo esto se debe sumar las excelentes actuaciones de ganadores de oscar y de varios nominados, además de caras conocidas ya en el trabajo de Nolan, una preciosa y cuidad cinematografía, la mejor edición sonora que he visto en películas como ésta y un soundtrack que recuerda tanto a los trabajos minimalistas de Phillip Glass como a las épicas sonoridades que genera Zimmer. Todo lo anterior filmado en IMAX, estos agregados hacen que la producción deba ser disfrutada en no menor calidad que en FULL HD y con audio descomprimido como se presenta en un BLU RAY que por sí solo vale el precio que trae. Adicionalmente la caja cuenta con un DVD, material adicional, una copia digital para la computador y un cuadro (filme de celuloide) de una escena de la película, donde se puede corroborar que está grabada originalmente en formato IMAX y convierte una compra común en una pieza de colección. La película satisfacerá a amantes de la ciencia ficción, como a coleccionistas, amantes del suspenso, el existencialismo, la relatividad, amantes de películas épicas y de las películas de acción. No se pueden perder esta obra maestra.

Für mich ist "Interstellar" einer der besten Filme aller Zeiten und markiert den absoluten Olymp des Sci-Fi-Genres. Aber nicht nur inhaltlich, sondern vor allem technisch setzt diese 4K UHD Blu-ray Maßstäbe. Hier meine Eindrücke zur Technik: ​Das Bild: Absolute Referenz Visuell ist die Scheibe aktuell das Maß der Dinge. Die Schärfe und die Farben sind unglaublich. Besonders die IMAX-Szenen sind atemberaubend und nehmen einen förmlich mit in die unendlichen Weiten des Weltraums. Wer wissen will, was sein TV wirklich kann, muss diesen Film einlegen. ​Der Ton: Brachiale Gewalt auch ohne 3D-Sound Ein wichtiger Hinweis vorweg: Es gibt hier keinen 3D-Ton (kein Dolby Atmos oder DTS:X). Aber lassen Sie sich davon bloß nicht abschrecken! Die vorhandene DTS-HD Master Audio Spur ist schlichtweg phänomenal. Was hier an Bass und räumlicher Tiefe geboten wird, sucht seinesgleichen. Der Score von Hans Zimmer drückt mit einer Wucht in den Raum, dass die Wände wackeln. Ich habe selten (oder eigentlich nie) ein so heftiges und immersives Heimkino-Erlebnis gehabt. ​Fazit: Technisch sind Bild und Ton absolute Spitzenklasse. Wer einen 4K-TV, einen Player und eine vernünftige Surround-Anlage besitzt, muss diesen Film in der Sammlung haben. Es ist eine Demonstration dessen, was Heimkino leisten kann. ​Kaufempfehlung: 100%

Un 4K a avoir dans sa collection. Magnifique.

Absolut Cinema

Très grand classique de la science-fiction interstellar en ultra HD HDR à voir et à revoir