

Buy anything from 5,000+ international stores. One checkout price. No surprise fees. Join 2M+ shoppers on Desertcart.
Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to UK.
“Fleming's books are sparklingly sardonic and hilariously angry”— Guardian “An excellent and important book''— Journal of Education, Innovation, and Communication To Professor Peter Fleming, there is a strong link between the neo-liberalization of higher education over the last 20 years and the psychological hell now endured by its staff and students. He believes that impersonal and unforgiving management hierarchies have supplanted academic judgement, collegiality, and professional common sense. He bemoans the modern system of higher education and shines a spotlight on what’s gone wrong and why. While academia was once thought of as the best job in the world, one that fosters autonomy, craft, intrinsic job satisfaction, and vocational zeal, you would be hard-pressed to find a lecturer who believes that now. Fleming delves into this new metrics-obsessed, overly hierarchical world to bring out the hidden underbelly of what he terms the 'zombie university'. He examines: *Commercialization *Mental illness and self-harm *The rise of managerialism *Students as consumers and evaluators *The competitive individualism which casts a dark sheen of alienation over departments *And much more! Arguing that time has almost run out to reverse this decline, this book shows how academics and students need to act now if they are to begin to fix this broken system. Review: An excellent and alarmingly disturbing book... - The title of the book is a clever play on a current Internet and Tik Tok trend, which is also considered a somewhat bleak and dissonant (but attractive) “life-aesthetic” labeled, “Dark Academia” (traceable to and popularized by the novel Secret History by Donna Tarrt). So, potential readers must not be misled by the Fleming’s use of the phrase “Dark Academia” in the title of his book. I never heard of Prof. Peter Fleming before reading this book. I can now say with confidence that he is a superb and highly engaging author and scholar! He is a keen observer, a careful researcher, and a superb analyst – unfortunately, his conclusions (he’s also a prescient if not prophetic seer of sorts) regarding the future of our current university system(s) are decidedly bleak and even pessimistic – but not to the point of a fatalism…for there is a brief prescriptive offered here, albeit tempered. The book focuses on – in succinct terms – the “dark” and deleterious influence that social efficiency (Taylorism), instrumentalism, vocationalism, and corporatism – spawns of neoliberalism’s insidious expansion of the free market – have on both contemporary university systems (US, UK, Australia, New Zealand) and the psychic-emotional-intellectual health of pedagogues and their students. And, as he concludes, the results are downright depressive. This book is not about statistics per se, rather it focuses on the human or “inhumane” toll that living, teaching, and learning in an educational system that has graduated from a “factory” model to a “corporate” model, operating in terms of a business model grounded in efficiency and economic advancement – at the exclusion of learning – has taken on all those involved. Each chapter reads as a “self-contained” essay, organized around the general theme I mentioned above. This is probably not surprising, since the author informs readers that the complete book was developed from the publication of one of the chapters. Topics: A specific introduction to the phenomenon of “dark academia” is given and nested within the milieu of late capitalism, through the expression of the “edu-factory,” which include “education/industry partnerships with arms manufacturers and fracking firms, among othered”; the turn toward authoritarianism in educations’ corporate design and structure; the death of the traditional or free academic; the exploration of what efficacy and “impact” mean in the corporatization of higher education; the analysis of “student hellscapes,” within which students are stressed to the point of suicide, under the insurmountable weight of financial burdens inextricably tied to securing an education; and one of my favorite chapters, the folly of the “academic star-complex” (here, one cannot help but think of the cult of Derrida). The book concludes with speculation concerning a potential way out of the dire situation – a diagnosis accompanied by a highly tempered prescriptive. I’ll leave it to readers to draw their own conclusions and assess the effectiveness or plausibility of Fleming’s suggestions, all this considering the moribund conditions that he so vividly describes and brings to life for readers. “The darkness evolves over time. It begins with outrage, transitions to frustration and finally settles as a deep-seated dismay. But seldom is it expressed as open rebellion (collective or otherwise).” Fleming is certainly not the typical (oldish) plodding academic; he’s of a newer and younger breed. He writes in a fast and agitated, but highly readable, style. Be warned, however, he has the tendency to construct short and dramatic sentences that require, for readers not steeped in the ongoing and agonistic debates about these issues, a bit more unpacking and elaboration. This is an excellent and alarmingly disturbing book. It is one of the best I have read on the topic and stands with the likes of Mark Slouka and Martha Nussbaum, both of whom write on this continuing crisis (this opinion coming from an oldish, plodding academic!). To concretize a personal observation related to Fleming’s book: According to the business or corporate model – the “edu-factory” – “Homo Academicus is now one of the most measured and audited characters in modern society.” Casuals and adjuncts (“ghost employees”) are now closely monitored and scrutinized, evaluated for their so-called pedagogical efficacy. However, they are not assessed by master-teachers or administrative staff members, but instead by young, inexperienced auxiliaries reporting to the higher-ups, all in service of the economic and instrumental ends of the university – professors must best serve at once the products and consumers of education: the students – with the bottom line of producing “earners’ and “return customers.” These evaluators are typically early post-graduates without doctorates, possessing little to no teaching experience, but they are steeped in typical “methods” courses that comprise the common curricula of most education degrees. It is shameful, and beyond, harmful, that such evaluations hold the potential to determine the fate of professors who might have successfully taught for upwards of 20-years. These reports are submitted to department heads (as the auxiliaries serve the management regime) who often don’t even know the name of the professor under evaluation and are thus oblivious to the good work he or she might have done for many years in the classroom. Dr. James M. Magrini Former: Philosophy/College of Dupage NCIS See also my: “Beyond Profit: The Value of the Humanities” Academia.edu Review: New book arrived - Arrived brand new. Highly recommended!





| Best Sellers Rank | #253,721 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) #157 in Coping with Suicide Grief #160 in History of Education #272 in Philosophy & Social Aspects of Education |
| Customer Reviews | 4.3 out of 5 stars 96 Reviews |
J**I
An excellent and alarmingly disturbing book...
The title of the book is a clever play on a current Internet and Tik Tok trend, which is also considered a somewhat bleak and dissonant (but attractive) “life-aesthetic” labeled, “Dark Academia” (traceable to and popularized by the novel Secret History by Donna Tarrt). So, potential readers must not be misled by the Fleming’s use of the phrase “Dark Academia” in the title of his book. I never heard of Prof. Peter Fleming before reading this book. I can now say with confidence that he is a superb and highly engaging author and scholar! He is a keen observer, a careful researcher, and a superb analyst – unfortunately, his conclusions (he’s also a prescient if not prophetic seer of sorts) regarding the future of our current university system(s) are decidedly bleak and even pessimistic – but not to the point of a fatalism…for there is a brief prescriptive offered here, albeit tempered. The book focuses on – in succinct terms – the “dark” and deleterious influence that social efficiency (Taylorism), instrumentalism, vocationalism, and corporatism – spawns of neoliberalism’s insidious expansion of the free market – have on both contemporary university systems (US, UK, Australia, New Zealand) and the psychic-emotional-intellectual health of pedagogues and their students. And, as he concludes, the results are downright depressive. This book is not about statistics per se, rather it focuses on the human or “inhumane” toll that living, teaching, and learning in an educational system that has graduated from a “factory” model to a “corporate” model, operating in terms of a business model grounded in efficiency and economic advancement – at the exclusion of learning – has taken on all those involved. Each chapter reads as a “self-contained” essay, organized around the general theme I mentioned above. This is probably not surprising, since the author informs readers that the complete book was developed from the publication of one of the chapters. Topics: A specific introduction to the phenomenon of “dark academia” is given and nested within the milieu of late capitalism, through the expression of the “edu-factory,” which include “education/industry partnerships with arms manufacturers and fracking firms, among othered”; the turn toward authoritarianism in educations’ corporate design and structure; the death of the traditional or free academic; the exploration of what efficacy and “impact” mean in the corporatization of higher education; the analysis of “student hellscapes,” within which students are stressed to the point of suicide, under the insurmountable weight of financial burdens inextricably tied to securing an education; and one of my favorite chapters, the folly of the “academic star-complex” (here, one cannot help but think of the cult of Derrida). The book concludes with speculation concerning a potential way out of the dire situation – a diagnosis accompanied by a highly tempered prescriptive. I’ll leave it to readers to draw their own conclusions and assess the effectiveness or plausibility of Fleming’s suggestions, all this considering the moribund conditions that he so vividly describes and brings to life for readers. “The darkness evolves over time. It begins with outrage, transitions to frustration and finally settles as a deep-seated dismay. But seldom is it expressed as open rebellion (collective or otherwise).” Fleming is certainly not the typical (oldish) plodding academic; he’s of a newer and younger breed. He writes in a fast and agitated, but highly readable, style. Be warned, however, he has the tendency to construct short and dramatic sentences that require, for readers not steeped in the ongoing and agonistic debates about these issues, a bit more unpacking and elaboration. This is an excellent and alarmingly disturbing book. It is one of the best I have read on the topic and stands with the likes of Mark Slouka and Martha Nussbaum, both of whom write on this continuing crisis (this opinion coming from an oldish, plodding academic!). To concretize a personal observation related to Fleming’s book: According to the business or corporate model – the “edu-factory” – “Homo Academicus is now one of the most measured and audited characters in modern society.” Casuals and adjuncts (“ghost employees”) are now closely monitored and scrutinized, evaluated for their so-called pedagogical efficacy. However, they are not assessed by master-teachers or administrative staff members, but instead by young, inexperienced auxiliaries reporting to the higher-ups, all in service of the economic and instrumental ends of the university – professors must best serve at once the products and consumers of education: the students – with the bottom line of producing “earners’ and “return customers.” These evaluators are typically early post-graduates without doctorates, possessing little to no teaching experience, but they are steeped in typical “methods” courses that comprise the common curricula of most education degrees. It is shameful, and beyond, harmful, that such evaluations hold the potential to determine the fate of professors who might have successfully taught for upwards of 20-years. These reports are submitted to department heads (as the auxiliaries serve the management regime) who often don’t even know the name of the professor under evaluation and are thus oblivious to the good work he or she might have done for many years in the classroom. Dr. James M. Magrini Former: Philosophy/College of Dupage NCIS See also my: “Beyond Profit: The Value of the Humanities” Academia.edu
F**G
New book arrived
Arrived brand new. Highly recommended!
C**O
Unclear and chaotic
The book promises a lot and some good points are made but it is mostly based on slogans and the argument is not well built. Many matters are simplified and only the perspective of big paid universities is taken.
R**A
Excellent Book
Excellent Book. It very clearly describes how Higher Education Institutes have gotten to the current state of low morale, constant upheaval and general unhappiness. For anyone involved in higher education, this is very informative and helpful in working with the powers-to-be.
S**T
Um olhar para um futuro incerto, e não só na academia
Excelente livro sobre um tema particularmente difícil. Importante para entender para onde caminha a sociedade moderna do jeito que ele está estruturada. A situação é bastante complexa e pode comprometer o funcionamento das universidades tal como eram vistas até uns poucos anos atrás. O futuro dessas instituições é incerto, como é hoje o futuro das relações de trabalho - foco do livro - e das questões ambientais que afetam as vidas de todos nós.
C**Z
Muy buen libro para discutir la universidad del siglo XXI
Gran libro, como profesor presenta una muy buena critica al sistema que rige a las universidades.
B**R
Spot on!
It is very rare indeed that I find myself in such agreement with an author. Fleming's analysis of what has gone so badly wrong in contemporary Higher Education hits the nail squarely on the head.
R**E
Timely, upsetting read
This is a harrowing read, detailing the ways that universities have been impacted by economic aims and neoliberal ideas.
A**E
An excellent read
An excellent read, with sharp analysis, even if it isn’t particularly uplifting. I especially enjoyed the chapter on the „academic star-complex“.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
2 days ago